Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to make a submission to this journal. All submissions will be assessed by an editor to determine whether they meet the aims and scope of this journal. Those considered to be a good fit will be sent for peer review before determining whether they will be accepted or rejected.

Before making a submission, authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission, such as photos, documents and datasets. All authors identified on the submission must consent to be identified as an author. Where appropriate, research should be approved by an appropriate ethics committee in accordance with the legal requirements of the study's country.

An editor may desk reject a submission if it does not meet minimum standards of quality. Before submitting, please ensure that the study design and research argument are structured and articulated properly. The title should be concise and the abstract should be able to stand on its own. This will increase the likelihood of reviewers agreeing to review the paper. When you're satisfied that your submission meets this standard, please follow the checklist below to prepare your submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Conference Proceedings Submissions

Peer Review Policy for Curevance (CVN)

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Curevance undergo a double-blind peer review process. Initial screening by the editorial office ensures compliance with the journal’s scope and ethical standards. Selected submissions are reviewed by at least two independent experts in the field who assess the manuscript's scientific validity, originality, relevance, and clarity. The average review time is four to six weeks.

The final decision is made by the editorial team based on reviewers' recommendations. Authors are notified of decisions promptly and may appeal if they believe an error in the review process occurred.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this Conference Proceedings Series and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.